American Psychological Association: Explain the principles of research design.
RESEARCH METHODS AND INVESTIGATING PSYCHOLOGY
|
Unit Reference Number |
R/650/1282 |
|
Unit Title |
Research Methods and Investigating Psychology |
|
Unit Level |
4 |
|
Number of Credits |
20 |
|
Total Qualification Time (TQT) |
200 hours |
|
Guided Learning Hours (GLH) |
100 hours |
|
Mandatory / Optional |
Mandatory |
|
Unit Grading Type |
Pass / Refer |
Unit Aims
The aim of this unit is to equip learners with the knowledge and understanding of research and methodology in psychology, with an introduction to statistics and how they interact. Methodology and statistics are introduced here and include design considerations, counterbalancing, sample versus population, descriptive statistics, histograms, summary statistics, and hypothesis testing.
Learning Outcomes and Assessment Criteria
|
Learning Outcome – The learner will: |
Assessment Criterion – The learner can: |
|
1. Understand the experimental methods applied in psychology. |
1.1 Explain the principles of research design. 1.2 Analyse how scientific method, experimental and descriptive research are interlinked. |
|
2. Understand research methods. |
2.1 Describe research methods used in psychology. 2.2 Explain how to conduct simple statistical tests commonly used in psychology. |
|
3. Understand types of data analysis and evaluation. |
3.1 Describe types of data analysis used in research. 3.2 Analyse the interrelationship between statistics and research hypotheses in psychology. |
|
4. Be able to carry out research design and review. |
4.1 Research psychological papers to inform research design. 4.2 Apply and justify choice of method to a research scenario. 4.3 Review and reflect on own learning. |
Unit Title Research Methods and Investigating Psychology |
Task 1 of 1 |
Unit Learning Outcomes |
|
LO 1 Understand the experimental methods applied in psychology. |
|
LO 2 Understand research methods. |
|
LO 3 Understand types of data analysis and evaluation. |
|
LO 4 Be able to carry out research design and review. |
|
Task Assessment Criteria to be covered |
|
1.1, 1.2, 2.1, 2.2, 3.1, 3.2, 4.1, 4.2, 4.3, |
Assignment Brief and Guidance |
|
This task requires you to present a report, in which you review the structure of psychological studies in current journals to better understand the conventions used for researching and reporting psychological investigations. Using one of the reports reviewed, focus on the design decisions made for a psychological research study and describe how you would put them into practice. You do not need to carry out the investigation. You are creating a psychological study to demonstrate your understanding of research design and reporting. In your report, you should:
You should be able to use psychological terminology and know how to use skills to describe, explain, analyse and evaluate information. You need to use the knowledge and understanding from the course, as well as the additional information your teacher or lecturer provides you with that is specific to this assignment. The research report you need to produce for your assignment must conform to standards for report writing in psychology. You must also comply with ethical standards for psychological research. It is essential that you are familiar with the most recent version of the Code of Ethics and Conduct which applies to all psychological research: Please refer to the American Psychological Association (APA) or British Psychological Society (BPS) for guidance. |
Delivery and Submission |
|
The report should conform to the style and format of a psychology research report. The recommended word limit is 3000 words excluding diagrams, references, and appendices. |
Referencing |
|
You are expected to use relevant academic and reliable sources, and clearly reference these in your work. You must use the American Psychological Association (APA) referencing style which includes:
You should complete a bibliography to support all evidence. |
R/650/1282: Nine Criteria, One Connected Research Report
The real challenge in R/650/1282 is not answering nine criteria separately; it is making one decision survive across several of them. A journal paper chosen under AC 4.1 can influence the method justified under AC 4.2, while the hypothesis then affects the variables, design and statistics discussed elsewhere in the report. That dependency is easy to lose when the criteria are written one by one. Our OTHM Level 4 assignment help can be used when the full R/650/1282 report needs to be developed as one connected piece of work rather than nine disconnected answers.
For further reading, see this external resource.
You can also explore more resources on our website.