Contemporary Issues In Social Work Practice – Level 7 (MA) Written Assignment Plan Module Contemporary Issues in Social Work Practice Level Level 7 (MA Social Work) Assessment Written assignment based on the neighbourhood profile and social group developed in module workshops Word count 5,000 words Referencing Cite Them Right Harvard This MA social work assignment builds a sustained critical argument about poverty and social exclusion for one social group in a chosen UK neighbourhood, moving from causes and global context, through place and the neighbourhood effect, to community social work methods and an evidence-informed practice strategy under neoliberalism and austerity.
What “Critically Analyse” Means At This Level Do not just present evidence; interrogate it. For every claim, ask what it assumes, what it leaves out, whose interests it serves, and how it compares with an alternative account, ideally one from beyond the UK.
Suggested Structure (5,000 Words) Section Words LO Introduction: neighbourhood, social group and your argument 300 –
- Causes, impact and the global context 1,100 LO1
- Spatial dimensions and the neighbourhood effect 1,100 LO2
- Community social work and collective methods 1,100 LO3
- Wider context and an evidence-informed strategy 1,000 LO4 Conclusion 300 –
- Causes, Impact And The Global Context (LO1) Critically analyse the causes of poverty and social exclusion and their impact on your selected social group, grounded in your neighbourhood profile. Weigh individualist/behavioural explanations (often underpinned by neoliberal assumptions) against structural explanations rooted in the labour market, welfare policy and the deserving/undeserving distinction. Address impact directly (health and wellbeing, education, life expectancy, access to services) and name stigma and shame as part of that impact. Situate the UK experience within a named global comparator, using current statistics, policies or reports.
- Spatial Dimensions And The Neighbourhood Effect (LO2) Present the neighbourhood’s deprivation profile (IMD domains or equivalent) and critically evaluate what indices can and cannot capture about lived experience. Bring in territorial stigma and ask who gets to profile a place and how (e.g. profiling with a community rather than on it, or US redlining as politically constructed disadvantage). Connect this explicitly to how being from this area shapes access to, and treatment by, services.
- Community Social Work And Collective Methods (LO3) Identify which of Twelvetrees’ methods (community development, social action or social planning) best fits your neighbourhood, justified with evidence. Establish the benefits of community social work, then analyse its decline in the UK and the shift to standardised, target-driven practice, illustrated with a specific UK example (such as Grenfell Tower). Test your method against an international or philosophical comparator such as Ubuntu-based social work, and against the food-bank critique of depoliticised charitable responses.
- Wider Context And An Evidence-Informed Strategy (LO4) Name neoliberalism and austerity explicitly and trace how they reach the lives of your social group. Analyse shame, stigma and isolation as their social impact, and show how individual-blame narratives obscure structural causes. Identify who bears the risk and who benefits, and connect this to practice conditions (caseloads, proceduralism, managerialism, “McDonaldisation”). Propose and critically defend a specific alternative practice approach (e.g. anti-oppressive, strengths-based or participatory), acknowledging its limits and trade-offs. Conclusion And Referencing Draw the argument together so the marker can see all four learning outcomes clearly evidenced. Use Cite Them Right Harvard throughout and engage with primary or original sources where possible.