School of Education
EDUC5005 EDUC5012 MTPS500 Theories of Development and Learning | Assessment 2 / Case Study |Total marks: 50 HD Exemplary (40-50) D Excellent (35-39) CR Proficient (30-34) P Sound (25-29) F Unresolved (0-24) Criterion 1
24 marks
Theoretical Perspectives –
Identify and discuss relevant educational
theory and concepts
Clear, accurate and comprehensive explanations
of the chosen situation, indicating in-depth,
evidence-based knowledge of the principles and
concepts of three different theoretical
perspectives.
Clear and accurate explanations of the chosen
situation, indicating in-depth, evidence-based
knowledge of the principles and concepts of
three different theoretical perspectives. Clear, explanations of the chosen situation,
indicating reasonable, evidence-based
knowledge of the principles and concepts of
three different theoretical perspectives. Accurate explanations of the chosen situation,
indicating knowledge of the principles and
concepts of three different theoretical
perspectives
Limited or inaccurate knowledge presented of the
principles and concepts of three different
theoretical perspectives
Criterion 2
21 marks Evidence-Based Interventions-
based on each chosen perspective to
maximize learning and participation of all
students
Innovative, effective research based strategies /
interventions are proposed based on each
chosen perspective to maximize learning and
participation of all students. Submission
demonstrate high level of understanding of the
materials in set text and additional relevant
sources. Valid research based strategies/interventions
are proposed based on each chosen perspective
to maximize learning and participation of all
students. Submission demonstrates a
reasonable level of understanding of the
materials in set text and additional relevant
sources. Reasonable research based strategies/
interventions are proposed based on each
chosen perspective to maximize learning and
participation of all students. Some understanding
of the materials in set text and additional relevant
sources is evident. Clear descriptions of evidence-based
interventions based on each chosen perspective
Only minimal understanding of the content of set
text and additional sources are evident.
Lack of appropriate evidence or connection to
each identified theory. Limited or inaccurate
descriptions of interventions or these are
inappropriate.
Criterion 3 5 marks
Transcriptional elements of
writing
Essentially free from spelling, grammar, and
punctuation errors. Fluent sentence and
paragraph construction.5 marks Generally free from spelling, grammar, and
punctuation,errors. Sentences and paragraphs
are well-formed.4 marks Occasional minor spelling, grammar, and
punctuation errors. Sentences and paragraphs
are generally coherent.3 marks Frequent minor spelling, grammar, and
punctuation errors. Some awkward construction
of sentences and paragraphs.2.5 marks Frequent and seriousspelling, grammar, and
punctuation errors. Awkward or poor sentence
and paragraph construction. 0-2 marks Career
No marks Achievement in relation to
career goals
This assessment indicates an example
understanding of teaching a culturally diverse
group of children with different skills, abilities and
backgrounds. You should consider including it in
your DPP as evidence of achievement against
APST 1.3, 1.4, 1.5 and 1.6. This assessment indicates an excellent
understanding of teaching a culturally diverse
group of children with different skills, abilities and
backgrounds. You should consider including it in
your DPP as evidence of achievement against
APST 1.3, 1.4, 1.5 and 1.6. This assessment indicates a proficient
understanding of teaching a culturally diverse
group of children with different skills, abilities and
backgrounds. You should consider including it in
your DPP as evidence of achievement against
APST 1.3, 1.4, 1.5 and 1.6. This assessment indicates a sound
understanding of teaching a culturally diverse
group of children with different skills, abilities and
backgrounds. You should consider including it in
your DPP as evidence of achievement against
APST 1.3, 1.4, 1.5 and 1.6. This assessment unfortunately does not indicate
an understanding of teaching a culturally diverse
group of children with different skills, abilities and
backgrounds. Integrity Acting honestly, ethically and fairly is
taken very seriously in the University
and relates to the way you work with
others and share information, conduct
relevant research, incorporating evidence,
acknowledge the ideas and work of
others (which includes using APA7
referencing conventions correctly), and
present your work. Breaches are
reported and can lead to penalties.
Refer to Curtin’s Academic Integrity
webpage, which provides
comprehensive information and
guidance.
https://students.curtin.edu.au/essentials /rights/academic-integrity/ As best ascertained, you are undertaking your
studies ethically; exploring relevant research and
situating your own ideas within the academic
discourse; and using APA7 conventions
consistently and precisely to reflect this. As best ascertained, you are undertaking your
studies ethically, including ensuring that the
ideas of others gained from your reading and
research is acknowledged by correctly using
APA7 paraphrasing, quoting and referencing
conventions. As best ascertained, you are undertaking your
studies ethically, including ensuring that the
ideas of others gained from your reading and
research is acknowledged by correctly using
APA7 paraphrasing, quoting and referencing
conventions. As best ascertained, you are undertaking your
studies ethically, including applying APA7
paraphrasing, quoting and referencing
conventions to acknowledge ideas of others
gained from your reading and research; however,
some minor errors indicate you need to be more
vigilant about doing this accurately and