EEDUSD500 Understanding Neuro diversity Assignment ASSESSMENT 3 BRIEF Subject Code and Title EEDUSD500 Understanding Neuro diversity

EEDUSD500 Understanding Neuro diversity Assignment

 

ASSESSMENT 3  BRIEF
Subject Code and Title	EEDUSD500 Understanding Neuro diversity
Assessment Task	Report
Individual/Group	Individual
Length	2000(+/-10%).
Learning Outcomes	The Subject Learning Outcomes demonstrated by successful completion of the task below include: Analyse the learning strengths and weaknesses of neuro diverse conditions using a person-centred approach. Critically reflect upon bias, prejudices and assumptions associated with learning differences within the individual’s community settings. Design and promote inclusive educational practices for supporting neuro diversity. Contextualise historical and contemporary perspectives and practices for supporting individuals with neuro diverse conditions and their communities. Apply research, synthesis, analytical and communication skills in the area of neuro diversity. Submission Due by 11:55 pm AEST/AEDT Sunday end of Module 6.1 (Week 11) Weighting 40% Total Marks 100 marks

Assessment Task

Write a 2,000-word report discussing and evaluating inclusive interventions that support neuro diverse individuals and their carer/s within contemporary community settings. Based on your analysis of the barriers and challenges neuro diverse individuals are experiencing, propose a design of an evidence-based best practice intervention for a cohort with specific neurological conditions in your chosen setting, and detail the outcomes your designed intervention/support aim to achieve (i.e., how the cohort can successfully participate in society). Your report must be supported by substantial evidence and adopt person-centred approaches to ensure that it reflects the ‘voices’ of neuro diverse individuals.

Please refer to the Instructions section below for details on how to complete this assessment task.

 

Context

This assessment task allows you to demonstrate your comprehensive understanding of the subject material by summarising the best practice programs and resources that provide support for neuro diverse individuals and their carers. Through analysing the support for neuro diverse individuals, identifying the barriers they may face in accessing support/intervention resources and programs (e.g., prejudice and socio-economic factors) and exploring how to assist them in overcoming these barriers to successfully participate in society, you will gain advanced knowledge of effective support available for neuro diverse individuals. Additionally, this assessment task will allow you to consider how to design and develop these successful support/intervention resources and programs for your chosen setting.

 

Instructions

 

This assessment task requires you to write a 2,000-word report. In it, you will discuss and evaluate interventions for neuro diverse individuals and their caregivers in community settings, propose a design for an evidence-based best practice intervention and outline the desired outcomes of the intervention.

 

Please review all essential learning resources provided in Modules 1- 6 prior to writing the report.

Read the assessment rubric, which is an evaluation guide that includes the criteria that will be used to mark and grade your report. The rubric indicates what features a successful report should contain.

 

To complete this assessment task successfully, you will need to follow the steps outlined below:

 

1. Select neuro divergent conditions and setting

Select three neuro logical conditions that constitute neuro diversity that you are interested in working on. Specify the setting for which you will evaluate and design the interventions (e.g., schools, health centres, community organisations, parent groups).

 

1. Research and gather evidence

 

To prepare for this assessment task, carefully review the content on neuro diversity, person-centred approaches and inclusive interventions covered in Modules 1-6.

 

Adopt a person-centred approach and search for resources on individuals of the neurological conditions of your choice. You should explore the following points:

 

1. Neuro diverse individuals’ characteristics and how they link to the definition of the neurologicalconditionpresentedonDiagnosticStatisticalManual5thEdition(DSM5)
2. Existing interventions for these individuals.

 

You should provide evidence of your research, both from academic resources as well as lived experienced of the neuro diverse individual.

 

1. Follow the structures and guided questions to write your reflection

 

Please review the Academic Skills page for Report Writing in preparation for this assessment task.

Follow the structure provided below when writing the report; use the suggested word count as a guide only.

 

• Executive Summary

 

In this section (300-400 words),you will briefly summarise your report. As a minimum, you will need to briefly describe the chosen neuro diverse conditions and setting and discuss the purpose of your report (i.e., producing a best practice guide to better support neuro diverse individuals with XYZ conditions in a chosen setting). You should also briefly describe the findings of your review on the existing intervention/s and your plan for designing best practices ones. The executive summary is not included in the word count.

• Table of Contents–This section is not included in the word count.

 

• Introduction (200-300 words)

 

• Introduce the topic and the neuro diverse conditions under investigation (describe background information, methods, identify problems, etc.). You should describe the neuro diverse conditions including the general background information, how you identify the conditions and how they co- occur. You should also provide an overview of the neuro diverse individuals’ characteristics and how these link to the DSM 5 definition.
• Methods and Findings (500-600words)

 

In this section, you should outline how you selected the sources and what you have identified as suitable interventions for your chosen cohort. Consider the following questions:

• What forms of analysis did you use when reviewing each intervention?
• What prerequisites did you put in place when selecting and evaluating each intervention?
• Were there any individual characteristics that you could not find beneficial interventions for? Link this to the next section where you will address this in your plan for designing and developing interventions.
• Did you find any interventions in other countries that could work but are not available in your setting? Link this to the next section where you will address this in your plan for design and developing interventions.
• Action Plan (800-1,000words)

 

In this section, you should outline how you plan to better implement intervention/s in your chosen setting. You should consider the following points:

-Detail the modifications that you are going to make based on your review of the existing intervention/s.

-Describe the plan for implementing modified interventions with your chosen cohort in the chosen setting. Justify your implementation with a description of how they will benefit the individuals’ are as for growth or help them overcome the barriers that they face in accessing the chosen setting.

-Propose the way of evaluating and measuring the effectiveness of the intervention.

-Consider how you will include the person’s voice when discussing why you have chosen a specific intervention.

 

 

• Conclusion (200-300 words)

 

-Summarise the key points of your report.

 

 

 

• Reference List

A minimum of 10 academic references (e.g., journal articles, book chapters, conference papers) are required. You should also include non-academic references that are person-centred and support the ideal of lived experience (e.g., blog articles, vlogs, newspaper articles, advocate websites, among others). All references should be listed following APA 7th style guidelines. Using Wikipedia, Investopedia and similar sources should be avoided. This section is not included in the word count.

 

When writing your report,

• You should consider who is going read it .Think about individuals in your setting who may benefit from the information.
• Ensure that the formatting and layout result in a document that is easy to read and sign posts each section to the reader.

 

1. Format of Your Report

 

• Headings: You should include subtitles in your report to sign post each section (e.g., Methods).
  • Font: 11-pointCalibri, 11-point Arial, or 10-point Lucida Sans.
  • Line spacing: Your entire report should be double-spaced. There should not be extra spaces between paragraphs.
  • Align left: The text of your essay should be lined up evenly at the left margin but not at the right margin (i.e., do not use justified alignment). 2.5cm margins at the top, bottom, right and left of every page. Default margin in Word 2.5cm.
  • Page numbers: The title page is your first page. Place page numbers in the upper right-hand corner of the page.
  • Academic sources are required, as detailed on page 2 of the Academic Writing Guide. The

Reference list page should start on a new page.

• In-text citations are included within the word count; however, the reference list is not included in the word count.

 

Referencing

It is essential that you use current APA style for citing and referencing the sources that you use. Please see more information on citing and referencing guidelines on the Academic Skills webpage.

 

Assessment Support

For arrange of additional resources and support to help you complete your assessment, please consult the Study Support page on the Student Hub.

 

Academic Integrity

 

All students are responsible for ensuring that their submitted work is original, adheres to academic writing standards outlined in the Torrens University Academic Writing Guide, and is appropriately referenced according to the guidelines provided in the Torrens University APA Referencing Guide.

Students need to have read and be aware of the Torrens University Australia Academic Integrity Policy,Academic Integrity Procedure and subsequent penalties for academic misconduct. For more information, please refer to the Academic Integrity guidelines and the Torrens University Library.

 

Students must also keep all required evidence in making an assessment; a copy of all submitted material and any assessment drafts.

 

Generative AI

Please refer to the Torrens University Library for guidance on the use of Generative AI. Please speak to your learning facilitator regarding the use of GenAI tools in your assessments.

 

 

Submission Instructions Example

Submit this task via Assessments>Briefs & Submissions in the main navigation menu in EEDUSD500:

Understanding Neuro diversity. Please name your file using the following format:

• Subject Code_ Surname _First Name Initial_ Assessment Number

e.g.MGMT6002_Jones_S_Assessment2.docx

Your marked assessment can be viewed in MyLearn.

 

 

Assessment due Dates and Late Penalties

Assessments maybe submitted on or before the due date. Late penalties apply for assessments that are submitted after the due date.

Refer to:

• Assessment Policy for Higher Education Coursework(HE) and ELICOSTorrens University| Think Education
  • Assessment Special Consideration Guidelines for Students (HE Coursework)Torrens University |Think Education

 

• Student Hub for Assessment Extension Information.

 

 

Special Consideration

To apply for special consideration for a modification to an assessment task or exam due to unexpected or extenuating circumstances, please consult the Assessment Policy for Higher Education Coursework and ELICOS and, if applicable to your circumstance, submit a completed Application for Assessment Special Consideration Form to your learning facilitator.

 

 

 

Assessment Rubric

 

Assessment Criteria	High Distinction (Exceptional) 85-100%	Distinction (Advanced) 75-84%	Credit (Proficient) 65-74%	Pass (Functional) 50-64%	Fail (Yet to achieve minimumstandard) 0-49%
Understanding of neuro diverse conditions and characteristics Percentage for this criterion = 20 %	Demonstrates a comprehensive and detailed understanding of the chosen neuro diverse conditions. Describes clearly and provides an in-depth analysis of all the characteristics of individuals with these conditions and all the challenges that they face.	Demonstrates a strong understanding of the chosen neuro diverse conditions. Clearly describes most of the characteristics of individuals with these conditions and most of the challenges that they face.	Demonstrates a satisfactory understanding of the chosen neuro diverse conditions. Clearly describes some of the characteristics of individuals with these conditions and some of the challenges that they face.	Demonstrates a basic understanding of the chosen neuro diverse conditions. Clearly describes a few characteristics of individuals with these conditions and a few of the challenges that they face.	Fails to demonstrate an understanding of the chosen neuro diverse conditions. Fails to clearly describe the characteristics of individuals with these conditions and the challenges that they face.
Research and evaluation of existing interventions	Demonstrates an outstanding and insightful review and evaluation of existing interventions, offering a thorough analysis of their effectiveness, strengths, weaknesses, and	Demonstrates an advanced review and evaluation of existing interventions, offering a well-developed analysis of their effectiveness, strengths,	Demonstrates a proficient review and evaluation of existing interventions, offering a good analysis of their effectiveness, strengths, weaknesses, and	Demonstrates a functional review and evaluation of existing interventions, offering a basic analysis of their effectiveness, strengths, weaknesses, and	Fails to provide a review and evaluation of existing interventions, or offer an analysis of their effectiveness, strengths,

 

 

Percentage for this criterion = 20%	Potential areas for improvement. Reference to a high number of person- centred sources that offer diverse perspectives to support the inclusion of these interventions.	weaknesses, and potential areas for improvement. Reference to many person- centred sources that offer diverse perspectives to support the inclusion of these interventions.	Potential areas for improvement. Reference to some person- centred sources that offer diverse perspectives to support the inclusion of these interventions.	Potential areas for improvement. Reference to few person- centred sources that offer diverse perspectives to support the inclusion of these interventions.	weaknesses, and potential areas for improvement. No or very limited reference to person- centred sources that offer diverse perspectives to support the inclusion of these interventions.
Development of best practice interventions Percentage for this criterion = 30 %	Presents a well-structured, comprehensive and innovative action plan to design and implement evidence-based best practice interventions with a strong and clear rationale of how to address the needs and challenges faced by neuro diverse individuals. Outstanding proposal of evidence-based strategic plan to measure the effectiveness and impacts of interventions and how they could be sustained within their specific environment.	Presents a well- structured and thought- out action plan to design and implement evidence- based best practice interventions, with a clear rationale of how to address the needs and challenges faced by neuro diverse individuals. Professional proposal of evidence-based strategic plan to measure the effectiveness and impacts of interventions and how they could be sustained within their specific environment.	Presents a satisfactory action plan to design and implement evidence-based best practice interventions, with an adequate rationale of how to address the needs and challenges faced by neuro diverse individuals. Adequate proposal of evidence-based strategic plan to measure the effectiveness and impacts of interventions and how they could be sustained within their specific environment.	Presents a basic action plan to design and implement evidence- based best practice interventions, but the plan lacks detail and does not fully address the needs and challenges faced by neuro diverse individuals. Basic proposal of evidence- based strategic plan to measure the effectiveness and impacts of interventions and how they could be sustained within their specific environment.	Fails to provide a clear or feasible action plan to design and implement evidence-based best practice interventions for neuro diverse individuals and does not address their needs and challenges adequately. Limited proposal of evidence-based strategic plan to measure the effectiveness and impacts of interventions and how they could be sustained within their specific environment.