Requires Lopeswrite
Assessment Description
The foundation of a successful RTI model is to monitor both student learning and instructional practices and use information gathered to make data-driven decisions. Teachers should utilize practical classroom assessments to monitor student progress across all tiers of instruction, especially during intervention and remediation. Formative assessments are frequently used to evaluate student learning to make intentional instructional decisions about intervention and remediation. Essential factors to consider include reliable and valid progress monitoring measures that align with student learning goals, consistent and ethical administration of assessments, scoring and graphing of data, analyzing data to inform data-driven instructional decisions, and respectfully communicating progress to all stakeholders.
Part 1: Analyzing Student Data
Utilizing Savannah’s, Grayson’s, and Alejandro’s case studies from “RTI: Progress Monitoring,” imagine you are meeting with the RTI team to discuss the next steps for these students.
Choose the following deliverables to complete this assignment:
Using the delivery of your choice, present your data analysis and recommend next steps for each student to the RTI team. Include the following information about each student:
Part 2: Student and Family Communication
Write a 250-500-word summary on how you will partner with students and families to make data-driven instructional decisions. In your summary, explain the following information:
Support your delivery with a minimum of two scholarly resources.
Submit your delivery, including a link to the deliverable, a summary, and relevant resources, as a single document.
While APA Style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses rubric. Review the rubric before beginning the assignment to familiarize yourself with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is in Class Resources if you need assistance.
Rubric Criteria
expand all Rubric CriteriaExpand All
Summary and Analysis of Student Data
7.5 points
Criteria Description
Summary and Analysis of Student Data
5. Target
7.5 points
Summary and analysis of each student’s progress monitoring data are thorough.
4. Acceptable
6.53 points
Summary and analysis of each student’s progress monitoring data are complete.
3. Approaching
5.55 points
Summary and analysis of each student’s progress monitoring data are missing key details.
No Submission
0 points
Not addressed.
Instructional Recommendations
15 points
Criteria Description
Instructional Recommendations
5. Target
15 points
Recommendations for instructional next steps for the students are ideal and substantially supported by student data.
4. Acceptable
13.05 points
Recommendations for instructional next steps for the students are suitable and adequately supported by student data.
3. Approaching
11.1 points
Recommendations for instructional next steps for the students are somewhat inaccurate and minimally supported by student data.
No Submission
0 points
Not addressed.
Individual Learner Goals and Progress Monitoring
15 points
Criteria Description
Individual Learner Goals and Progress Monitoring
5. Target
15 points
Individual learning goals for students needing to continue or begin intervention are meaningful. Steps to progress monitor the goal are realistic.
4. Acceptable
13.05 points
Individual learning goals for students needing to continue or begin intervention are appropriate. Steps to progress monitor the goal are reasonable.
3. Approaching
11.1 points
Individual learning goals for students needing to continue or begin intervention are shallow. Steps to progress monitor the goal are overly simplistic.
No Submission
0 points
Not addressed.
Student Data Discussions and Goal Setting
11.25 points
Criteria Description
Student Data Discussions and Goal Setting
5. Target
11.25 points
Discussion of how an educator can use data to guide and engage students in self-analysis, literacy goal setting, and reflecting on learning is insightful. The system/strategy an educator can use with a student to track their learning and progress towards individual goals, including discussion of how the system/strategy can be used to inform future instruction based on identified learning gaps and patterns, is meaningful.
4. Acceptable
9.79 points
Discussion of how an educator can use data to guide and engage students in self-analysis, literacy goal setting, and reflecting on learning is significant. The system/strategy an educator can use with a student to track their learning and progress towards individual goals, including discussion of how the system/strategy can be used to inform future instruction based on identified learning gaps and patterns, is credible.
3. Approaching
8.33 points
Discussion of how an educator can use data to guide and engage students in self-analysis, literacy goal setting, and reflecting on learning is artificial. The system/strategy an educator can use with a student to track their learning and progress towards individual goals, including discussion of how the system/strategy can be used to inform future instruction based on identified learning gaps and patterns, is inexplicit.
No Submission
0 points
Not addressed.
Family Communication of Student Data
11.25 points
Criteria Description
Family Communication of Student Data
5. Target
11.25 points
Ways to communicate with families about student data and progress are innovative. Discussion of how an educator can communicate data to students and families showing respect and dignity while still conveying urgency is thought-provoking.
4. Acceptable
9.79 points
Ways to communicate with families about student data and progress are noteworthy. Discussion of how an educator can communicate data to students and families showing respect and dignity while still conveying urgency is concise.
3. Approaching
8.33 points
Ways to communicate with families about student data and progress are weak. Discussion of how an educator can communicate data to students and families showing respect and dignity while still conveying urgency is vague.
No Submission
0 points
Not addressed.
Organization
7.5 points
Criteria Description
Organization
5. Target
7.5 points
The content is well-organized and logical. There is a sequential progression of ideas that relate to each other. The content is presented as a cohesive unit and provides the audience with a clear sense of the main idea.
4. Acceptable
6.53 points
The content is logically organized. The ideas presented relate to each other. The content provides the audience with a clear sense of the main idea.
3. Approaching
5.55 points
The content is not well organized even though it provides the audience with a sense of the main idea.
No Submission
0 points
Not addressed.
Supporting Research and Documentation of Sources
3.75 points
Criteria Description
Uses appropriate designated style and formatting to document sources in citations and references.
5. Target
3.75 points
Supporting research is compelling and thorough. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
4. Acceptable
3.26 points
Supporting research is credible and relevant. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.
3. Approaching
2.78 points
Supporting research is minimal and somewhat inaccurate. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although several minor formatting errors are present.
No Submission
0 points
Not addressed.
Mechanics of Writing
3.75 points
Criteria Description
Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.
5. Target
3.75 points
No mechanical errors are present. Skilled control of language choice and sentence structure is used throughout.
4. Acceptable
3.26 points
A few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.
3. Approaching
2.78 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.
Essay Writing Service Features
Our Experience
No matter how complex your assignment is, we can find the right professional for your specific task. Custom Essay Writing Services for Students Worldwide is an essay writing company that hires only the smartest minds to help you with your projects. Our expertise allows us to provide students with high-quality academic writing, editing & proofreading services.
Free Features
Free revision policy
$10Free bibliography & reference
$8Free title page
$8Free formatting
$8How Our Essay Writing Service Works
First, you will need to complete an order form. It's not difficult but, in case there is anything you find not to be clear, you may always call us so that we can guide you through it. On the order form, you will need to include some basic information concerning your order: subject, topic, number of pages, etc. We also encourage our clients to upload any relevant information or sources that will help.
Complete the order form
Once we have all the information and instructions that we need, we select the most suitable writer for your assignment. While everything seems to be clear, the writer, who has complete knowledge of the subject, may need clarification from you. It is at that point that you would receive a call or email from us.
Writer’s assignment
As soon as the writer has finished, it will be delivered both to the website and to your email address so that you will not miss it. If your deadline is close at hand, we will place a call to you to make sure that you receive the paper on time.
Completing the order and download
