This week, you will begin to develop your Systematic Plan of Evaluation. Create

Proficient

Identifies and includes all accrediting agency standards related to curriculum and institutional support.

Acceptable

Identifies and includes most accrediting agency standards related curriculum and institutional support.

Developing

Identifies and includes some accrediting agency standards related curriculum and institutional support.

Unsatisfactory

Identifies and includes few accrediting agency standards related curriculum and institutional support.

Proficient

Identifies highly relevant and useful evidence needed and plans for benchmarks and the “feedback loop” of reporting, communication, and continuous improvement.

Acceptable

Identifies relevant and useful evidence needed and plans for benchmarks and the “feedback loop” of reporting, communication, and continuous improvement.

Developing

Identifies some evidence needed. May be missing plans for benchmarks and the “feedback loop” of reporting, communication, and continuous improvement.

Unsatisfactory

Fails to identify evidence needed. Missing plans for benchmarks and the “feedback loop” of reporting, communication, and continuous improvement.

Proficient

Fully explains how table will be used to evaluate a nursing program. Demonstrates a sophisticated ability to critically think about the chosen accreditation agency’s standards, necessary evidence, benchmarks, and the “feedback loop” of reporting, communication, and continuous improvement.

Acceptable

Explains how table will be used to evaluate a nursing program. Demonstrates ability to critically think about the chosen accreditation agency’s standards, necessary evidence, benchmarks, and the “feedback loop” of reporting, communication, and continuous improvement.

Developing

Partially explains how table will be used to evaluate a nursing program. May fail to demonstrate ability to critically think about the chosen accreditation agency’s standards, necessary evidence, benchmarks, and the “feedback loop” of reporting, communication, and continuous improvement.

Unsatisfactory

Fails to explain how table will be used to evaluate a nursing program. Fails to demonstrate ability to critically think about the chosen accreditation agency’s standards, necessary evidence, benchmarks, and the “feedback loop” of reporting, communication, and continuous improvement.

Proficient

The writing demonstrates sophisticated clarity and conciseness and is extremely well organized. Punctuation, spelling, and capitalization are all correct with minimal to no errors.

Acceptable

The writing is clear, concise, and well organized. May contain a few punctuation, spelling, or capitalization errors.

Developing

The writing lacks clarity, conciseness, or organization. Several errors in punctuation, spelling, and capitalization detract from the readability of the paper.

Unsatisfactory

The writing is unfocused and poorly organized. Many errors in punctuation, spelling, and capitalization detract from the readability of the paper.

Proficient

The assignment accurately and consistently follows APA Style. Meets length and formatting requirements of the assignment.

Acceptable

The assignment consistently follows current APA Style with only isolated and inconsistent mistakes. Mostly meets length and formatting requirements of the assignment.

Developing

The assignment has numerous errors in APA Style. Reflects incomplete knowledge of APA Style. May not meet length and formatting requirements of the assignment.

Unsatisfactory

The assignment has significant errors in APA Style. Does not meet length and formatting requirements of the assignment.